First Impressions of Buffalo Ways
Jumping into Buffalo Ways, the setup felt instantly familiar. Gong Gaming Technologies has utilized a 6x4 grid with 4,096 ways to win, a structure that volatile slot fans usually appreciate. The betting range is quite modest, stretching from 0.40 to 20.00. While the graphics struck me as a bit dated for a 2022 release, the game performed smoothly during my session on both desktop and mobile, offering a straightforward, no-nonsense prairie experience.

Symbols and Payouts in Buffalo Ways
The paytable relies heavily on the North American wildlife theme. The lower end consists of standard 9-A royals, with the Ace paying 3.75x for five. The premium symbols-raccoons, eagles, deer, and bears-offer better returns, but the Buffalo is naturally the top payer at 7.5x stake for five. I noticed high-value symbols can appear stacked, which helps in connecting those wins across the adjacent reels.
Two special symbols dictate the flow of the game. The Wild is a scenic prairie image that substitutes for all regular symbols but will not pop up on the first reel; it works as a crucial connector in the base game. The Scatter is simply text-based, and seeing three or more of them is the only way to break into the bonus features where the real potential lies.
Symbol Payouts
| Symbol | Payout |
|---|---|
![]() | 6 → x7.5 |
| 5 → x6.25 | |
| 4 → x5 | |
| 3 → x3.75 | |
| 2 → x1.25 | |
![]() | 6 → x6.25 |
| 5 → x5 | |
| 4 → x3.75 | |
| 3 → x1.25 | |
| 2 → x0.375 | |
![]() | 6 → x6.25 |
| 5 → x5 | |
| 4 → x3.75 | |
| 3 → x1.25 | |
| 2 → x0.375 | |
![]() | 6 → x5 |
| 5 → x3.75 | |
| 4 → x2 | |
| 3 → x1 | |
| 2 → x0.25 | |
![]() | 6 → x5 |
| 5 → x3.75 | |
| 4 → x2 | |
| 3 → x1 | |
| 2 → x0.25 | |
![]() | 6 → x3.75 |
| 5 → x2.5 | |
| 4 → x1 | |
| 3 → x0.5 | |
![]() | 6 → x3.75 |
| 5 → x2.5 | |
| 4 → x1 | |
| 3 → x0.5 | |
![]() | 6 → x3 |
| 5 → x2 | |
| 4 → x0.75 | |
| 3 → x0.25 | |
![]() | 6 → x3 |
| 5 → x2 | |
| 4 → x0.75 | |
| 3 → x0.25 | |
![]() | 6 → x2.5 |
| 5 → x1.5 | |
| 4 → x0.5 | |
| 3 → x0.25 | |
![]() | 6 → x2.5 |
| 5 → x1.5 | |
| 4 → x0.5 | |
| 3 → x0.25 | |
![]() | Scatter |
![]() | Wild |
Triggering the Buffalo Ways Bonus
Triggering the Free Spins round required landing at least three Scatters, which netted me an initial eight spins. The scaling here is impressive; if you manage to land six Scatters, you are awarded a massive 100 free spins. I found the retrigger mechanic generous as well, essentially mimicking the initial trigger conditions, meaning you can restart the feature with the same number of spins as the triggering Scatters.
The real game-changer during the bonus is the behaviour of the Wilds. Whenever a Wild forms part of a win during free spins, it applies a random multiplier of 2x, 3x, or 5x. During my play, having multiple Wilds in a single winning way was the highlight, as their multiplier values were added together rather than multiplied, significantly boosting the payout for that specific spin.
RTP and Winning Potential
Statistically, Buffalo Ways sits comfortably with an RTP of 96.04%. It is a high volatility machine, which matched my experience of enduring dry spells followed by sudden bursts of activity. The maximum win is capped at 12,000x the bet, meaning a max bet spin could theoretically yield 240,000. It requires patience, and I had to watch my bankroll closely while chasing those elusive Scatters.

Final Thoughts on Buffalo Ways
Despite the somewhat generic visuals and basic sound design, Buffalo Ways delivers where it counts mechanically. It reminds me strongly of Playtech's Buffalo Blitz, sharing similar features and themes. If you can look past the outdated graphics, the potential for 100 free spins and additive Wild multipliers provides enough thrill to make this prairie trip worth taking.
In-Game Screenshots






Buffalo Ways FAQ
Buffalo Ways — Comparison
| Game | RTP | Volatility | Max Win | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 96.04% | High | x12000 | ||
| 96.92% | Average | x2000 | ||
| 95.72% | High | x10000 | ||
| 96.9% | Average | x10000 | 7 | |
| 95.12% | 94.13% | 92% | Low | x10000 | 7.3 | |
| 96.5% | High | x4500 | 6 | |
| 94.20% | Average | x2500 | 10 | |
| 94.40% | High | x3133 | 6.5 | |
| 96.47% | High | x3000 | 4 | |
| 96.24% | Average | x2000 | 7 | |
| 97.15% | High | x1000 | ||
| 96.05% | High | x7300 | 7 | |
| 96.19% | High | x7290 | ||
| 96.44% | Average | x1000 | ||
| 96.14% | Average | x1000 | 7 | |
| 96.12% | Average | x5000 | 6 | |
| 96.14% | Average | x1000 | 6 | |
| 92.08% | Average | x500 | 7 | |
| 96.2% | Average | x2000 | ||
| 96% | High | x5000 | ||
| 96.12% | High | x10000 | ||
| 96% | High | x5000 | 5 | |
| 96.80% | High | x12000 | 7 | |
| 96.50% | High | x5000 | 8 | |
| 95.07% | High | x20000 | 6 | |
| 95.72% | Average | x2176 | 7 | |
| 96% | High | x10467 | ||
| 95.75% | Above average | x10000 | 9 | |
| 95.69% | 94.68% | 92.68% | 90.72% | High | x20000 | 8 |












